Filter by topic
Filter by content type
Update on Sensitive Locations Litigation
In January of 2025, President Donald Trump withdrew a policy known as the “sensitive locations memo,” which had previously limited immigration enforcement in locations such as houses of worship and religious ceremonies. Religious groups challenged the withdrawal of these protections as, among other things, a violation of the groups’ religious liberty rights. This document provides updates on initial decisions in these lawsuits.
FAQs on Religious Liberty & Immigration
This FAQ explains whether and how RFRA might apply to protect people and communities of faith from immigration-related surveillance and enforcement.
Whose Faith Matters? The Fight for Religious Liberty Beyond the Christian Right
A comprehensive report documenting the many contexts in which people of faith engaged in humanitarian and social justice work have fought for the right to exercise their religion.
Amicus Brief and Press Advisory: USA v. Hoffman, et al.
Nationally recognized law professors with expertise in religious liberty law filed an amicus brief in the appeal of the convictions of four sanctuary activists who were found guilty in the crime of leaving water and food in the desert for migrants.
Amicus Briefs: U.S. v. Deighan, U.S. v. Hoffman
LRRP’s Founding Director, Katherine Franke, filed two amicus briefs in support of activists from the migrant relief group No More Deaths.
Amicus Brief: U.S. v. Scott Warren
Five prominent professors of law and religion, including LRRP’s Founding Director, Katherine Franke, filed an amicus brief in support of Dr. Scott Warren, a humanitarian aid worker who faces up to twenty years in prison for providing food and shelter to migrants crossing the Arizona desert.